What is the extent of the legal binding force of the Korea-Japan Agreement of December 28, 2015 on the “comfort women” issue? <Part 2>

<Part 2>

Nam Kijeong (Institute for Japanese Studies, Seoul National University)/ Cho Yanghyeon (Institute of Foreign Affairs and National Security)/ Cho Sihyeon (The Center of Historical Truth and Justice)

• 2019-09-04
• Editorial Team of Webzine <Kyeol>

To build responsible dialogue between the two countries to clarify the truth

<Part 3> Panel: Nam Kijeong (Institute for Japanese Studies, Seoul National University)/ Cho Yanghyeon (Institute of Foreign Affairs and National Security)/ Cho Sihyeon (The Center of Historical Truth and Justice)

• 2019-09-03
• Editorial Team of Webzine <Kyeol>

The 2011 Constitutional Court’s Decision on the Unconstitutionality of Omission Marks the Turning Point for the “Comfort Women” Issue <Part 1>

<Part 1> Panel: Nam Kijeong (Institute for Japanese Studies, Seoul National University)/ Cho Yanghyeon (Institute of Foreign Affairs and National Security)/ Cho Sihyeon (The Center of Historical Truth and Justice)

• 2019-09-05
• Editorial Team of Webzine <Kyeol>

Concerning Experience and “Situated Knowledge”

The meaning that experience is a movement and the creation of a situation or a relationship indicates that “I” seeking to put it into words am also a being taking on a part of a new relationship in the movement.

• 2021-10-06
• Ichiro Tomiyama(冨山一郎)

A Story of Constant Struggle: The “Comfort Women” Issue in North Korea

Historian Harrison C. Kim traces how discourse on “Comfort Women” in North Korea has evolved—at times in dialogue with the outside world—while developing distinct advocacy practices and perspectives.

• 2025-11-04
• Cheehyung Harrison Kim